|
Post by Natalie Tenerelli on May 28, 2015 2:00:15 GMT
I defended my allies on RI, if that's what you're talking about, because you were talking trash just to cause drama. You were initially targeted because you and Abi were telling everyone different things for the vote, which made everyone feel unsafe at such an early stage in the game. I wrote about it in my confessionals when it happened, with no mention of wanting to exact vengeance or who you had played in past games: I never told Keith that also, that was a lie. Abi did want Woo out yes. Jim made up that lie cause I didn't want you out. I did tell Liz that, cause Keith told me Woo was, and I provided screenshots. I was loyal as fuck to the people I had deals with.
|
|
Joe
Jury
Posts: 324
|
Post by Joe on May 28, 2015 2:06:01 GMT
also, I know y'all are heavily leaning towards voting for So if she makes the end. Can I just ask why that is? For me its between So and Abi, just because they've overcome a lot in this game. So has played very well socially in my opinion. Liz has done nothing, knows she's done nothing, and missed her shot to do something. Aras has done stuff but he doesn't understand the fundamentals of the game. He sees no problem burning people and lying to them just to advance himself. He has no social tact, he burns you and has the mentality that you're still going to vote for him because "he's playing the game". He's like Russel Hantz in that sense, he's not malicious, but it's as though he expecting everyone to just magically vote for him in the end based on his gameplay without doing anything to win over the jury beforehand. You don't just win the game in the FTC, you have to work on jurors going into it and Aras just doesn't get that at all and his lack of understanding shows that he's not a good player.
|
|
|
Post by Diggy Diesel J Jim Bomb Lynch on May 28, 2015 2:19:03 GMT
also, I know y'all are heavily leaning towards voting for So if she makes the end. Can I just ask why that is? Has been sociable, calm, and has avoided a lot of the shit talking that's taken place. Strategically, So hasn't done as much as other people have, but she hasn't burned bridges the same way other people have. I'd vote Aras over her, but she's above Abi and Liz in my book. I get why she's getting support.
|
|
|
Post by kt on May 28, 2015 2:28:15 GMT
I never told Keith that also, that was a lie. Abi did want Woo out yes. Jim made up that lie cause I didn't want you out. I did tell Liz that, cause Keith told me Woo was, and I provided screenshots. I was loyal as fuck to the people I had deals with. OK, then I was misinformed. Regardless of who was telling the truth, the fact was that people thought you were spreading shit and started to gun for you. I didn't start the train against you. Keith wanted you out and then everyone else pushed for it as well. I was a bandwagoner on that vote, for all intents and purposes.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie Tenerelli on May 28, 2015 2:30:20 GMT
Well thank you for finally owning up to wanting me out cause of a past season. There might have been lies spread about me by keith that added to it, but I just wanted you to admit that.
|
|
|
Post by Laura Morett on May 28, 2015 10:50:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Parvati Shallow on May 28, 2015 11:07:30 GMT
My vote will also be between Abi or So Kim. They were both alligned with me, so let's say it simply is personal, but they have overcome a lot just like Joe has said. Aras is a blithering moron when it comes to the game of Survivor because he has no jury management skills. Congrats, you can make it to the end by being a backstabbing, conniving player, but that doesn't mean we're gonna give you the win. I'm just gonna say Liz was pretty damn boring when I was talking to her too. I'm leaning more towards So Kim because I believe she probably did more, but I guess we'll see.
|
|
|
Post by kt on May 28, 2015 13:06:56 GMT
I don't feel like Abi or So did like anything at all but next to Aras who, while having made moves, doesn't exactly have excellent jury management (like everyone has said) it's kind of tough to count them out. I love Liz as a person but she herself has said that she doesn't think she can win for obvious reasons. There are like 3 or 4 people on the jury who I'd probably vote for over everyone that's left, so it's 100% gonna come down to FTC performances for me I think
|
|
Joe
Jury
Posts: 324
|
Post by Joe on May 28, 2015 16:39:38 GMT
LOLOLOL AT THAT SUE SHADE.
|
|
|
Post by Laura Morett on May 28, 2015 17:32:11 GMT
JOE!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Natalie Tenerelli on May 28, 2015 17:39:36 GMT
So and Abi have both played a very solid game. They weren't shady at all, not fake as fuck, and knew how to not piss off the jury.
|
|
|
Post by Laura Morett on May 28, 2015 22:19:34 GMT
They don't piss you because they have no chance to do it for your two rounds at merge.
|
|
|
Post by kt on May 28, 2015 23:20:28 GMT
omfg @ Sue LMAOOOOOO I'm howling
|
|
|
Post by Natalie Tenerelli on May 29, 2015 2:37:26 GMT
I will say that Abi does not get a lot of credit. She knows how to play under the radar, and people feel like they have no reason to target her. She is involved in a lot of the blindsides and voting out of power players, so I think she definately deserves the win as well as So.
|
|
|
Post by Diggy Diesel J Jim Bomb Lynch on May 29, 2015 4:09:29 GMT
Sue being an absolute boss, good stuff.
I'm not voting for Abi in the end unless she nails FTC. Early on she made a ton of Final Two deals (her 3rd message to me was asking for a Final Two) and then she didn't make much of an effort to keep communication up with me. If you're gonna be in an alliance with someone, talking to them is crucial. Otherwise it's meaningless if you make a deal and do nothing to actually build a bond with that person. After the first Natalie vote, she then re-offered me a Final Two deal (and then offered Katie one minutes later), and then again did nothing to talk to me. At the merge, she joined in on the "Let's rage at the minority" and then as soon as you got the boot Natalie, she backpedaled and threw you under the bus hardcore and said you were the one insulting us and she went along with it to make you happy. She might've been involved in the Joe boot and my boot, but Liz was involved in even bigger votes that were actual blindsides. Both of them were tagalong votes to bigger players who had poor social games, and I don't want to reward either one in the end. Same game, just on different sides. I sided with Liz, Laura, and Joe in the round he went home, because Abi was going to have jury support and I didn't want her in the end because I saw her as the least deserving person outside of my alliance.
|
|