|
|
Post by Petey P on Jun 3, 2015 4:31:07 GMT
I'm looking over EVERYTHING. Grawr!
Firstly, I have opinions on all of y'all, but I will say that my vote is very much so up in the air! Any one of you could take this thing pending on everything I read and see from you all here!
As a pre-question: Out of the 3 of you, who hit on me the most?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aras Baskauskas on Jun 3, 2015 4:35:08 GMT
:/
I'm straight but I'm not above starting now....
|
|
|
|
Post by Petey P on Jun 3, 2015 4:43:55 GMT
Nah nah, serious question here. Which of the 3?
|
|
|
|
Post by kt on Jun 3, 2015 5:13:20 GMT
can I answer this question
|
|
|
|
Post by Laura Morett on Jun 3, 2015 6:16:17 GMT
I love Pete to death, did I win prize?
|
|
|
|
Post by Liz Kim on Jun 3, 2015 15:34:18 GMT
I'd say Abi did based on the conversations you and I had, Pete. In fact, oftentimes, I remember hearing that was the bulk of Abi's interactions: flirting and attempting to make deals. So I'd answer with Abi.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Jun 3, 2015 16:03:18 GMT
This no life LOSER was brought back to vote, and Big Mama Sue wasn't!? IN FUCKING JUSTICE! #PetesALoserWithNoOneWhoLovesHim
|
|
|
|
Post by Petey P on Jun 3, 2015 16:10:57 GMT
bing! Liz gets the point! it was creepy, off putting, and annoying and I hate that I felt like I had to go along with it. So the rest of questions will be directed to Liz and Aras where it's actually up in the air! Liz: I think a big point that's been made about you and the flaws in your game is that you were quiet, and your social interactions were lacking. Sorry for repeating what's been said a million times, but hey gotta preface the question! Theorize this game from merge onwards assuming you stepped up the social game, what changes? Would you be here? How much would you have really impacted the game? Aras: We had some great conversations at the beginning of the game, and there seems to be some resentment against you, but the arguments I've seen don't really hold up IMO. Think allll the way back to that scavenger hunt challenge where I was giving your tribe answers so y'all would win (lil whoopsie on my part  ), what would have honestly happened if your tribe went to tribal? Would you have gone out right then and there? |
|
|
|
Post by Petey P on Jun 3, 2015 16:11:29 GMT
Also Sue, you love me don't even. This big front is just a ploy and playing hard to get  |
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Jun 3, 2015 16:39:54 GMT
I'm not into flaming twinks, sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Liz Kim on Jun 3, 2015 16:48:31 GMT
Liz: I think a big point that's been made about you and the flaws in your game is that you were quiet, and your social interactions were lacking. Sorry for repeating what's been said a million times, but hey gotta preface the question! Theorize this game from merge onwards assuming you stepped up the social game, what changes? Would you be here? How much would you have really impacted the game?
Assuming I step up my social game and in a perfect world...
11th- Parvati: No real change here. This was a decision based on our alliance where we operated under the assumption that Parvati wouldn't have an idol played on her.
10th- Natalie: Again, no real change here. With Natalie's idol (or rather, the idol that was played on Natalie) out of the way, Natalie becomes prime target and still goes out here.
9th- Woo: Again, these first three rounds were pretty cut and dry in terms of who we wanted to target. Woo still goes here.
8th- Abi: This is where things would start to shake up. I attempted to save Joe here but Katie was the one who was opposed to keeping Joe. In a perfect world, Abi goes 5-3 or 6-2. The reason Abi would be taken out here was because she had relationships with So as well as Natalie who was still on Redemption at this point. There was also concern that Aras wanted to take along Abi as a number.
7th- So: Realistically, it'd make sense to take out So before Abi, but Abi would be an easier sell since more people saw Abi as less of a threat and more as a non-entity. So would just happen to follow after Abi, assuming she doesn't win immunity.
6th- Jim: Katie established to me at Final 8 that she wanted to make a move against Jim soon. Presumably at 6, Myself, Joe, Katie, and Aras vote against Jim while Jim/Laura vote for Joe(?)
5th pt. 1- Aras: Aras would be seen as too much of a challenge threat in this scenario so he'd have to go here.
5th pt. 2- Whomever returns between Aras/Jim/So because chances are, they have the goodwill of the jury and would've already proved themselves as a threat.
4th- Laura or Joe: It would ultimately depend on immunity and who was believed to be the biggest jury threat.
FTC: Me, Katie, one of Laura/Joe
I think in theory, I have a chance. Katie would be seen as too shady from the jury while Laura or Joe might be seen as tag-alongs? I think Joe would be the favorite going in however.
I think if I step my social game up, this is the resultant. I'd say if this happens, I make a pretty big impact on the game, deciding who goes when, sussing out who's aligned with who, and ultimately, forging better relationships.
Thanks, Pete!
|
|
|
|
Post by Petey P on Jun 3, 2015 16:54:36 GMT
I'm not into flaming twinks, sorry I've been described as more of a bear.  |
|
|
|
Post by Aras Baskauskas on Jun 3, 2015 17:10:31 GMT
Aras: We had some great conversations at the beginning of the game, and there seems to be some resentment against you, but the arguments I've seen don't really hold up IMO. Think allll the way back to that scavenger hunt challenge where I was giving your tribe answers so y'all would win (lil whoopsie on my part ), what would have honestly happened if your tribe went to tribal? Would you have gone out right then and there? I probably would've gotten voted out honestly. At this point Parvati is gunning for me no doubt. Abi would never work with Jim/Katie so she's kinda tied to Parv/So (not to mention any previous/developing relationship). And at this point Katie would have to make the choice between her ally Jim and a new ally Aras. I doubt Abi would put up a big fight if Parv/So suggested me. So that's 3 on Aras. I'd be voting Jim unless Parvati wanted Katie involved (even though they didn't necessarily need her if they wanted 3-2-1. In that case I'd vote Parvati no doubt and tie it. Go to rocks? In the end I think there's a lot of variables in the way of me thing that vote (trusting Katie over everyone so early in our relationship). Plus this is assuming Parvati/someone tips off Katie or myself. I doubt that happens so I probably go home. Sorry for the long winded "yes". I was without trust, numbers, or reliable information on nuLomand ie: screwed That's why I was so worried that tribal council. I had a block of 3 with the leaders going against me and then a block of two I couldn't fully trust yet. It probably would've taken balls/trust I didn't have to tie that vote. Edit: I would say the only reason I was welcomed by Parvati at the merge is because Lomand lost 3 during the tribe swap stage and she kinda needed me as a number. If we lost I was probably done |
|
|
|
Post by So Kim on Jun 3, 2015 17:26:27 GMT
Aras, there was no way you were going if we lost that tribal council. Me/Parvati/Abi wanted to work with you to get Jim/Katie out so you had nothing to worry about. Now, if we lost three then you would have probably been screwed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aras Baskauskas on Jun 3, 2015 17:33:05 GMT
Aras, there was no way you were going if we lost that tribal council. Me/Parvati/Abi wanted to work with you to get Jim/Katie out so you had nothing to worry about. Now, if we lost three then you would have probably been screwed. I honestly had no clue what would've happened. That was my best guess. My confessional that round starts with "I have no idea how a TC would go with my new tribe" haha But I'll take your word for it |
|
), what would have honestly happened if your tribe went to tribal? Would you have gone out right then and there?
